Daily Quote:  "The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit."
Milton Friedman

BE HEARD AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!

Why Register:

-Stay Informed
-Participate in Forums
-Make a Difference!

Click here to register
/ Login

Invite Your Friend to Tea!

Thank you for spreading the word!

Poll

Does Cap and Trade make sense, or is it just another government intrusion? :

Who's new

  • reayna
  • AdrienneAnise
  • philco
  • compassbearer
  • krotchity rocket
  • George
  • eantosh
  • billytwilly
  • Kathy Olsson
  • mheadley

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Does it seem the traditional American values, (of hard work; fair play; and personal freedom) are growingly threatened by an increasingly intrusive and irresponsible government? Recently, governments around the country have made unprecedented moves to expand their role in the economy and thus our lives.

The Tea Party Nexus exists to provide a voice for citizens throughout the country concerned about a government that wishes us to work for it, rather than it working for us.

New visitors, Register here to stay informed, share your thoughts and make a difference!

Corporate Taxes, and Their Real Impact On Small Business

" it isn’t really the corporation that pays the tax, but instead it is the shareholders, employees and customers who pay them through lower returns, lower wages and higher prices, respectively. "

Click here, to read full RCM article by Michael Ortner

How Obama Will Change American Capitalism

Whether one feels capitalism is nice or not, empirically there is no debate that no other system governing a society has produced more wealth for all its citizens in a shorter period of time than American capitalism.  No society has been able to produce a better standard of living for its citizens, or generate greater amounts of charity around the world, than America over its short history as a nation. 
The founding concepts behind America that its citizens own the product of their labor and the government exists to preserve those rights has been extraordinarily successful.  Yet it is amazing that there is even a debate as to whether or not that should be the way forward. 
 
This article in the New Republic begins to highlight how Obama will look to fundamentally alter the relationship between the government and American citizens, by claiming that the government is fundamentally entitled to everyone's productivity and thus free to redistribute those efforts at will.  Here is an interesting section of the article.
 
"Finally, there is the sheer size of Obama's intervention. Obama's stimulus program and its budget are going to lift overall government spending from the 30s to well over 40 percent of GDP. Its 2009 budget, along with other public spending, could reach 45 percent of GDP. That's in response to a crisis, but as has happened before, the extent of government intervention is likely to remain permanent."
 

Who Pays for Climate Policy?

Who Pays for Climate Policy? 

-In total, the annual burden from a cap-and-trade program would be $144.9 billion n American households, which would be about $1,218 per household.

-The analysis also shows that the burden of cap-and-trade would be disproportionately borne by low-income households because they tend to spend a larger fraction of their income on carbon-intensive products
Read Full Article by Matt Moon

 

Obamanomics: Does It Make Him a King or Jester?

King or jester?  Obama's views and decisions regarding GM and Chrysler are not looking good for his economic legacy.  This WSJ editorial starts to flesh out many of his decisions and thier likley effects.  It is instructive to read as it provides a perspective on Obama's decisoin making skills which will likely affect many other aspects of our lives.

Global Warming: Unstoppable Solar Cycles

Does Cap and Trade make sense, or is it just another government intrusion?

Registered visitors, share your thoughts.

Obama: "Cap & Trade Will Cause Electricity Rates To Skyrocket"

Janeane Garofalo and Olbermann

 

Tea Parties Unhealthy?

On the Sunday talking head circuit, David Axelrod suggested the Tea Party Movement is unhealthy (story here).  His logic is that Obama will cut taxes for 95% of Americans, so Americans should be happy with his policies. 
 
While a nice sound bite, he is a bit disingenuous.  The Obama administration is: creating record budget deficits - which crowds out private investment; extending government's reach into private businesses - putting government into unfair competition with private firms, and; raising the cost of private investing through increased capital gains and income taxes - which makes it more costly to grow or start businesses.  When such policies are combined with increased carbon taxation, the end result is likely to be less economic freedom and reduced long-term economic growth leading to lower living standards for the typical American.
 
While economists may differ on the aggregate effects of Obama's economic policy prescriptions, calling Tea Parties "unhealthy" is at best a lapse of judgment and at worst a potential indication of how Obama and his team views opposition to his policies.

 

Update - Hat tip to Instapundit.

A Rasmussen poll just released shows the Tea Parties were very well received by the public, with 51% having a favorable view versus 33% with an unfavorable view.  Particularly interesting, 54% of mainstream Democrats viewed Tea Parties favorably.

Not surprisingly, only 13% of the political elites had a favorable view of the events.

Global Warming and Economic Freedom

The public is shifting its view on "global warming" according to a new Rasmussen Report.  Currently 34% of those sampled believe human activity is the cause of "Global Warming", this is a significant decline from 47% a year ago. 

Today 48% feel planetary trends are the root cause of "Global Warming", versus only 34% a year ago.

The "Global Warming" mantra is used by state and national politicians to push for broader and stronger regulations and taxation related to carbon energy. 

As the "conclusive" evidence on climate change is increasingly criticized by the scientific community, it is silly to restructure the economy and reduce living standards until to evidence is conclusive that such a restructuring is critical to America's well being.

By creating highly invasive and complicated tax regimes related to carbon energy, politicians are again pursuing a massive power grab to gain further control of American's economic lives.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out if the public continues to demand harder scientific evidence to accept "Global Warming" as a man-made problem.

Ultimately, personal freedom is only possible through economic freedom. 

Madera Has Tea Party!

Join us April 15th

Town and Country Park - Pavilion

Corner of Granada and Industrial Blvd

From 6:00 PM to 7:00

 

Be Heard and Make a Difference!